When the gavel was passed to me, I made the commitment to continue the push for excellence in service to justice for Maryland through all levels of the courts. Many of the Judiciary’s recent accomplishments are a direct reflection of the exceptional leadership portrayed by my predecessor then Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera. Getty, 2021 – 2022 In September 2021, I was humbled and honored to be appointed by Governor Larry Hogan as chief judge for the Court of Appeals of Maryland. I have full confidence that the positive changes we made will inspire all future chief judges to continue to move the justice forward in Maryland.Ĭhief Judge Joseph M. The future is bright for the Judiciary and it is certain that access to justice will continue to flourish and grow. We accomplished so much together, and we persevered through the COVID-19 pandemic with the Judiciary continuing to provide access to justice throughout. I thank the many people who worked with me to help move justice forward in Maryland. PASSING THE GAVEL Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera, 2013 – 2021 In 2021, I concluded my time as chief judge of the Court of Appeals of Maryland. 13 Meaningful access: Unexpected opportunities presented by the COVID-19pandemic.17 9 Innovative approach: Finding creative ways toprovideservicessafely. 5 Community Impact: Striving for equal justice during a pandemic. 4 The Maryland Judiciary prepares for a post-COVID court system. ![]() 2 2021JudicialCouncil.3 2021JudicialCouncilCommittees. This report focuses on just a few highlights of the work of the Judicial Council and its committees during calendar year 2021. It is through their collective work that the Maryland Judiciary is fulfilling its mission and achieving its strategic goals in serving the people of Maryland. The Judicial Council and its committees, subcommittees, and work groups include a wide representation of the diverse Judiciary community: judges, magistrates, trial court clerks and administrators, commissioners, and justice partners throughout Maryland. These recommendations are reviewed by the Judicial Council and, if accepted, are forwarded to the Chief Judge for approval. Guided by the eight key goals of the Judiciary’s strategic plan, the committees develop recommendations for policies, programs, and initiatives that help ensure efficient operations and the timely and effective administration of justice in Maryland. The Judicial Council is the nexus through which its committees vet Judiciary-wide policy changes, judicial reforms, legislative issues, and other internal and external developments that affect the administration of justice. Use resources wisely.Īs the governance body of the Judiciary and principal policy advisor to the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals, the Maryland Judicial Council is committed to advancing the Judiciary’s mission of providing fair, efficient, and effective justice for all. Communicate effectively with stakeholders. ![]() Be responsive and adaptable to changing community needs. We are an efficient, innovative, and accessible court system that works collaboratively with justice partners to serve the people with integrity and transparency. ![]() VISION The Maryland Judiciary advances justice for all who come to Maryland’s courts. MISSION The Maryland Judiciary provides fair, efficient, and effective justice for all. Since being freed from prison, Syed has been hired at Georgetown University’s Prisons and Justice Initiative, where he works on prison reform.Maryland Judiciary Judicial Council 2021 Annual Report The ruling orders “a new, legally compliant and transparent hearing on the motion to vacate, where Mr Lee is given notice of the hearing that is sufficient to allow him to attend in person, evidence supporting the motion to vacate is presented, and the court states its reasons in support of its decision”. In its ruling on Tuesday, the Maryland appeals court agreed with Lee that the state violated his rights by giving him just one business day’s notice, and said “this court has the power and obligation to remedy those violations, as long we can do so without violating Mr Syed’s right to be free from double jeopardy”.īut the ruling also suggests Syed will not remain convicted for long and that the reinstatement will be temporary until the hearing is repeated. In December, Young Lee, Hae Min’s brother, filed an appeal arguing that prosecutors violated state law requiring them to give sufficient notice of hearings to victims or their representatives so they may attend in person. Prosecutors declined to recharge the case, entering what is known as a “nolle prosequi” in the court record. A circuit court judge then threw out Syed’s conviction, saying that the state had failed to turn over exculpatory evidence with the defense.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |